| ▲ | Arch-TK 7 hours ago | |
I don't use a Mac, but have you ever used Windows? I mean, maybe you have, but if you are not fussy then at worst MacOS is quirky and Windows and Linux are identical and merely have different icons. If you pay a little bit of attention you will notice that on linux things seem more flexible and intuitive. If you are very finnicky, there is nothing that comes close to X11 window managers when it comes to window management flexibility, innovation and power. | ||
| ▲ | II2II 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
Windows allows you to launch applications from a menu or via search. You can switch between windows with a mouse or keyboard shortcuts. Windows can either be floating, arranged in pseudo-tiled layers, or full screen. KDE can pretty much do the same under Wayland. Ditto for Gnome under Wayland, albeit to a lesser degree. That covers the bases for most people. X11 window managers were a mixed bag. While there were a few standouts, most of the variation was in the degree to which they could be configured and how they were configured. There may be fewer compositors for Wayland because of the difficulty in developing them, but the ones that do exist do standout. | ||
| ▲ | MangoToupe 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
> and Windows and Linux are identical and merely have different icons At least on this we can agree, but windows never had to reboot the window server in my experience | ||