So it is not structured as an acquisition to avoid anti trust but effectively it probably is.

whatsupdog 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Yes I'm sure that "non exclusive" partnership is exactly that, wink wink!

DivingForGold 8 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Indeed, as justincormack comments: ”It is not structured as an outright acquisition to avoid US Gov't anti trust scrutiny, but effectively it probably is”. “Non-exclusive” ? Ummmm, yeah, right, sure. You can probably bet there is an private understanding that Groq will no longer offer it's “top of the line” best technology to competitors of Nvidia. Some may see this as a clever, “slight of the hand” attempt for Nvidia to maintain it's perceived dominance & lead in GPU-TPU development. “Non-exclusive” does not in any form or fashion spell out that all Nvidia's competitors can and will obtain the very top, cutting edge Groq technology as Nvidia will obtain . . .

▲

biggc 6 hours ago | parent [-]

What generated this comment?

▲

symbogra 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Probably a good old fashioned Mk 1 Human Brain given the use of "slight of hand"

▲

deaux 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Looks like a normal comment to me, what makes you think otherwise? It has pretty much no hallmarks of being generated, and plenty that point towards the opposite.

	▲	ilikehurdles 2 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		Quoting the user it’s replying to in third person, and then hallucinating words inside the quote. When I have asked LLMs to read/dictate a linked text, the output is usually not a clean read but something reinterpreted with its own style.
	▲	squigz 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Starting the comment pointing out the name of the user you're replying to, and quoting the exact comment you're replying to, does sound really strange.

▲

rising-sky 6 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Grok... with a k

▲

janderson215 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

GPT1 Nano