If you say so. Sorry not see any of this. Valve is a good company and there reputation has been developed over the years as such.

▲

graynk 16 hours ago | parent [-]

this is just willingly turning a blind eye. it's not about the reputation or being a "good company", it's about the facts of what they do.

▲

trinsic2 12 hours ago | parent [-]

I'm choosing not to place the blame on them as I don't see it as something they can control. And I trust Valve to do the right thing over most any large game studio out there. The history of reputation and actions matter. I think you want to to try and skew the narrative based on you own particular bias. The situation is much bigger than what you are making it out to be.

	▲	graynk 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		> I think you want to to try and skew the narrative based on you own particular bias. This is exactly what you are doing. > The history of reputation and actions matter. The history of actions matter, yes. The history of actions on the gambling topic has been very consistent thus far from Valve.