| ▲ | wateralien 4 hours ago |
| I never travel without my GL-AXT1800. Saved me so many times: https://www.gl-inet.com/products/gl-axt1800/
I’m actually on it right now. |
|
| ▲ | guiambros an hour ago | parent | next [-] |
| Same! And the best thing is that you can install Tailscale, so you can connect to your tailnet, and exit all traffic through one of your nodes (e.g., your home/office network). It's incredibly useful, with the added bonus that you don't need to install tailscale client in any of your travel devices (phone, tablet, work computer, etc). |
|
| ▲ | hshdhdhj4444 7 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What advantage does this have over the cheaper UniFi router in the OP? |
| |
|
| ▲ | kleinsch 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Huge plus one. Useful to bridge hotel wifi so all my devices connect automatically, also useful as an ad-hoc router that fits into my travel pack. |
|
| ▲ | kstrauser 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Heartily seconded! A friend recommended I get one and now I push all my other technical friends to buy one, too. My wife and I traveled a bit this year and it was great having all our gadgets connecting to a single AP under our control. It’s easily paid for itself by avoiding ludicrous per-device daily charges. |
| |
| ▲ | windexh8er 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | I think most travel APs can generally do this, but the feature that makes GL.iNet products popular is: extensibility. I'm not sure why this is so hard to understand for manufacturers, but making products useful via extensibility is a sure fire way to open your target market directly up to prosumers. And those are the buyers that will find you. I own two of their products, one of them I bought in 2019 and can still run what I need to on it. | |
| ▲ | dzhiurgis an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Where do you travel that you need wifi? I’ve been getting SIM cards for over a decade, now even eSIMs are cheap enough for casual use. | | |
| ▲ | kstrauser an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I can’t put a SIM in my ereader or Switch or iPad. | |
| ▲ | lostlogin 39 minutes ago | parent | prev [-] | | Changing countries a lot reduces this option a bit. I’m sure I could find a good all Europe card, but I need my number for work calls. | | |
| ▲ | cycomanic 6 minutes ago | parent [-] | | In Europe you have free roaming so it (almost?) never makes sense to get a new sim per country. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | upcoming-sesame an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| How do you handle captive portals in hotels ? |
| |
| ▲ | jtokoph an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | Usually you connect your laptop/phone to the portable router network, which then just pulls up the captive portal. Once you auth from one device, any device behind the router is authed with the portal. This is because the hotel network just sees your router's IP/MAC. | |
| ▲ | mmerickel an hour ago | parent | prev [-] | | Connect on your phone or other device. Connect to travel router. Clone the mac address of your device. Connect router to wifi. Adjust device to not auto login. Good to go. | | |
| ▲ | dalanmiller 27 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Is this an annoying amount of steps? And do you have to do this on every expiry of your session on the portal? |
|
|
|
| ▲ | password4321 an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I could never figure out which gl-inet to get, since some of the newer products seemed less powerful than older ones depending on the product family or something... |
|
| ▲ | cosmosgenius an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Is this any better than just doing Hotspot with wifi bridge? I just have my hotspot on my pixel for my devices to connect to. Pixel itself is connected to whatever
"public wifi" is there. |
| |
| ▲ | gruez 24 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Does that actually work? I don't think you can both have hotspot on and be connected to another network. | | |
| ▲ | panarky 12 minutes ago | parent [-] | | Yes, it has actually worked starting with the Pixel 3. It's called Dual-Band Simultaneous or "STA+AP" (Station + Access Point) concurrency that can bridge an existing wifi connection to an access point to other devices via a hotspot. |
|
|
|
| ▲ | hnburnsy 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Have you tried hooking it up to an Ethernet port in a hotel room like the one that the TV uses? |
|
| ▲ | ei8ths 2 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| these are awesome, i just take my old wifi router tp-link, its big though. I might have to get one of these little guys. |
|
| ▲ | theoreticalmal 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| What is the benefit of this over, for example, an iPhone hotspot? |
| |
| ▲ | neither_color 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Run one wireguard server in your home and one client instance on this router and now all of your devices can share the same residential VPN connection. No fraud blocks or extra verifications from your banking apps, no million suspicious login detected from all your social accounts, use your home netflix account, etc. All without your individual devices running a VPN app. | | |
| ▲ | drnick1 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | > Run one wireguard server in your home and one client instance on this router and now all of your devices can share the same residential VPN connection. You don't need a "travel router" for this. My phone is permanently connected to my server via Wireguard (so that I can access my files from anywhere). Adding another device just requires adding a peer in the server's config file and can be accomplished very quickly. It's not clear what problem the travel router solves, unless perhaps you travel with dozens of devices. > no million suspicious login detected from all your social accounts, I can personally do without those. | | |
| ▲ | tstrimple an hour ago | parent [-] | | I can accomplish this via one access point instead of configuring wireguard on N*5 family devices. |
|
| |
| ▲ | WillPostForFood 3 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | An iPhone can't bridge a wifi network. So you need something like a travel router to share a wifi connection. | | |
| ▲ | rtkwe a few seconds ago | parent [-] | | They're suggesting just running off your data plan which works for domestic travel (at least to urban areas with good cell service) and can work for international if you go through getting a data eSim. |
| |
| ▲ | davedigerati 36 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | chromecast - godsend on long hotel stays. need to dial in through my home (wireguard) so no license issues with streamers and once I connect my GL.iNet GL-MT300N-V2 to hotel wifi instant bubble of safe wifi for all my devices! weighs nothing, been using for 8 years rock solid. | |
| ▲ | trelane 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You can control it from the ground up, including installing alternate firmware. You can also use VPNs etc. |
|
|
| ▲ | matt-attack 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| What’s the use case exactly? |
| |
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 an hour ago | parent | next [-] | | I have this. TP-Link AC750 https://a.co/d/esxrRA4 When you are some place with a captive network and want to use devices that don’t have a browser. You connect the router to the WiFi network that has internet access and you connect the other WiFi network to a device with a browser like your phone. Every device looks like one device to the captive network and you can use them all. Second use case, I now live in a place with a shared internet access that is shared between all of the units. Anyone can broadcast to and control our Roku device and there is no way to block it from the Roku. We create a private network with the router | |
| ▲ | tstrimple 2 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | One is actually usable wifi at hotels with ethernet cables available. I don't use that device, but a DIY version that also acts as a portable media server while traveling. We can tunnel back to our home network, but often stay places with very bad reception and or internet access. Also helps keep the kids entertained on longer road trips. They can connect their devices to the router as we travel and have full access to the cached media. |
|