Because that's the way our courts have ruled on it.

Nothing more complicated than that. The courts are empowered by the Constitution to interpret the Constitution, and their interpretation says kids can have their rights limited.

▲

mothballed 4 hours ago | parent [-]

True, but the executive and legislator are bound to ignore the courts if their interpretation violates the constitution. The judicial branch for instance can't simply declare that "No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law" means that "Clarence Thomas is god emperor of the US and commands all the armed forces."

If they could interpret the constitution and that was that, then the judicial branch would basically have ultimate power and be exempted from the checks the other branches have on them.

	▲	monocularvision 4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		They could still be impeached by the legislative branch.
	▲	lovich 3 hours ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		That’s called a constitutional crisis and then gets into bringing guns out to see who’s really in charge.
	▲	etchalon 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		They very much are not bound to ignore the courts. That's not a thing. That's very explicitly not a thing. Why would you think that's a thing?