> None of my house, papers, or effects are owned by anyone but myself.

Do you self host your own email? No? Those are "papers" that your email hosting provider can consent to providing law enforcement access to without a warrant.

Do you use search engines? Your search history is in the same boat with the search engine company.

Don't use a VPN? All of your internet traffic is in the same boat with your ISP

You use a VPN? All your internet traffic is in the same boat with the VPN.

The list goes on and on. It is almost certainly true that some company has private information about you that they can turn over without a warrant.

▲

irishcoffee 5 hours ago | parent [-]

You forgot “houses” there, boss.

▲

squigz 4 hours ago | parent | next [-]

You forgot to respond to anything except the "houses" part of this.

It's obvious what GP and others are saying - that the concept of things like "papers" and "effects" are no longer as concrete as they used to be. What used to be physical letters stored in one's home are now emails stored on any number of servers.

> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

	▲	4 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		[deleted]
	▲	irishcoffee 2 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Oh, sorry. None of my papers or effects are in jeopardy either.

▲

shkkmo 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Amazon's echo and other such IoT devices do extend this to "houses" but isn't quite as ubiquitous.

	▲	irishcoffee 4 hours ago \| parent [-]
		My house, papers, and effects aren’t not tied to whatever you’re calling out about the internet, not in the sense you’re insinuating. You’re conflating ideas to make a point. I admire the effort, you’re just not correct.