|
| ▲ | tkz1312 4 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| Not sure why self proclaimed "hackers" seem to be in love with walled gardens and corporate control :) |
| |
| ▲ | tt24 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | That's the thing, you don't have to be! You are welcome to use another phone more to your liking. | | |
| ▲ | hashier 3 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | There are 2 phone operating systems and both make things user hostile. So no, there is not a real choice to use another phone. And it's not only about users. Headphone manufactures too. Their headphones need to support both iOS and Android phones. | |
| ▲ | cromka 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | You obviously know that it's not just the phone, it's the apps we can use on them. There are only two companies and they both control the market. | | |
| ▲ | tt24 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | There are far more than two companies selling phones. | | |
| ▲ | Sayrus 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | And yet if you want applications to work on your phone, many times you'll need approval from either Apple or Google. Google can effectively ban manufacturers (like they did with Huawei) from using "Android" by blacklisting them from Play Services. Apple owns the entire ecosystem and prevents third-party from having access to the same feature set. | | |
| ▲ | tt24 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Something tells me that the thing about Google not allowing custom Andriod operating systems to install apps is not quite true. I don't know about this specific topic yet, but I bet that if I look into it, I'll find out that there's nuance here that isn't been correctly portrayed by your comment. | | |
| ▲ | anonzzzies an hour ago | parent [-] | | You need to allow Play the play store and it's services and those will wall you in. Many times discussed here: many banking, gov, health apps around the world are banning anything not blessed by Google or Apple and installing on a non blessed system will not allow you to use them. My bank allows a modern and supported android or ios phone or a Windows laptop with a biometric card reader. Pretty much locked in and all banks are following. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | phatfish 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Maybe because they are the only organisation able to act against the massive (foreign, if it is anything tech related for a European) corporate entities nowadays. |
| |
| ▲ | tt24 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Okay, so someone acting against something big and foreign is good? Why? | | |
|
|
| ▲ | georgebcrawford 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Because they're often acting as a bulwark against powerful MNCs. |
| |
| ▲ | tt24 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Let me know when Apple dictates what kind of transactions it's acceptable for me to engage in and which ones aren't - a decision that Apple has absolutely no say in, but the EU and other governing bodies regularly engage in. |
|
|
| ▲ | bigyabai 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Hey, don't take it personally. Apple is a known innovator in the field of government bribery: https://www.theverge.com/news/737757/apple-president-donald-... |
| |
| ▲ | tt24 4 hours ago | parent [-] | | Not sure what this has to do with my comment but okay! |
|
