| ▲ | ndriscoll a day ago | ||||||||||||||||
The goals of the people mandating Secure Boot are completely opposed to the goals of people who want to decide what software they run on the computer they own. Literally the entire point of remote attestation is to take that choice away from you (e.g. because they don't want you to choose to run cheating software). It's not a matter of "no one stepped up"; it's that Epic Games isn't going to trust my secure boot key for my kernel I built. The only thing Secure Boot provides is the ability for someone else to measure what I'm running and therefore the ability to tell me what I can run on the device I own (mostly likely leading to them demanding I run malware like like the adware/spyware bundled into Windows). I don't have a maid to protect against; such attacks are a completely non-serious argument for most people. | |||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | cogman10 a day ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||
And all this came from big game makers turning their games into casinos. The reason they want everything locked down is money is on the line. | |||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||