| ▲ | unethical_ban 9 hours ago | |||||||
What's the term for the ideology that "laws are silly because people sometimes break them"? | ||||||||
| ▲ | jeltz 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
Posting stuff into Deepseek is banned. The corporate firewall is like putting a camera in your home because you may break the law. But, yeah, arguing against cameras in homes because people find dead angles where they can hide may not be the strongest argument. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | collingreen 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I don't think that's a good read if the post you're implying this at. I think a more charitable read would be something like "people break rules for convenience so if your security relies on nobody breaking rules then you don't have thorough security". You and op can be right at the same time. You imply the rules probably help a lot even while imperfect. They imply that pretending rules alone are enough to be perfect is incomplete. | ||||||||
| ▲ | pigeonhole123 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
It's called black and white thinking | ||||||||