So is the data extracted the names of the victims that were supposed to be hidden to protect them? Or is there something else that might be worthy of exposing?

▲

deepsquirrelnet 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

It seems the redactions are to protect the perpetrators.

▲

JKCalhoun 7 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I'm seeing, for example, "Hyperion Air, Inc" was redacted.

Victim?

▲

kjkjadksj 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There are pages that are nothing but redacted text. It isn’t going to be a victims name copy pasted 80 times in a row…

	▲	wafflemaker 19 hours ago \| parent [-]
		>It isn’t going to be a victims name copy pasted 80 times in a row… You can't possibly know that! (Sorry, watching Grinch, Jim Carrey spoke through me).

▲

kgwxd 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

i assume the downvoters don't see the importance of the question.

▲

watwut 17 hours ago | parent [-]

The downvoters assume that it is a bad faith question. The downvoters are 99% right with that. If the 1% hit then OP is just exceedingly naive and did not followed the scandal in which case they should maybe first do some reading.

The names of involved powerful people were NOT supposed to be censored. All those names except Bill Clinton name were redacted. To protect Trump and everybody else involved in the scandal except said Bill Clinton. But especially to protect Trump.

▲

mapontosevenths 13 hours ago | parent [-]

They also obscured the male perpetrators faces and bodies in many images, illegaly.

▲

mindslight 11 hours ago | parent [-]

I assume that de facto federal "law" now makes it illegal to be raped, and those men are the victims. That would be a logical conclusion of edgelord vice signalling, right?

	▲	mapontosevenths 11 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I know what all of these words mean, but not when they're in this order.

▲

tempaccountabcd 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

[dead]