| ▲ | blell a day ago |
| [flagged] |
|
| ▲ | Y-bar a day ago | parent | next [-] |
| > always ends up catastrophically. Government intervention like forbidding led-based paints or asbestos in homes? Or government intervention like doing something about the ozone depletion? Government intervention like forbidding roaming fees? Intervention like requiring 3-point seat belts? Like progressive taxation? Like forbidding discrimination based on skin colour? Like air travel safety? Like a max ceiling on credit card fees? Always? |
| |
| ▲ | kibbber a day ago | parent [-] | | >Like progressive taxation? Like forbidding discrimination based on skin colour? Ok, sometimes. | | |
| ▲ | Y-bar 21 hours ago | parent [-] | | Give an example regulation which has objectively been catastrophic and where there has been no clear attempts at amending or improving it. | | |
| ▲ | raw_anon_1111 12 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Abortion abolition in states that are causing women to die because doctors are afraid to perform them even when it puts the woman’s life in danger not to perform them. It even put the life of a Republican lawmaker in dander in Florida. Of course she blamed democrats. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jun/22/kat-cammack-... | |
| ▲ | CamperBob2 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Some off-the-cuff examples that come to mind: - Drastic overregulation of nuclear energy in the US, resulting in fossil-fuel pollution measurable in gigatons over the past several decades accompanied by literally countless illnesses and premature deaths. - Premature mandates for airbags in cars that resulted in hundreds of needless child deaths because the technology wasn't yet safe enough for universal deployment. A scenario that's playing out right now with misfeatures like automated emergency braking. - The Jones Act (Merchant Marine Act of 1920), whose effects are too convoluted to go into here. - Misguided, market-distorting housing policies, ranging across the spectrum from rent control to Proposition 13. - Many if not most aspects of the War on Drugs, including but not limited to mandatory minimum sentencing and de-facto hardwiring of racial bias into the justice system. | |
| ▲ | kibbber 20 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I quoted a couple. | | |
| ▲ | Y-bar 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Please provide any tangible evidence that progressive taxation and prohibition on discrimination on the basis of race has been catastrophic. | |
| ▲ | baobun 12 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | You mean with your other sockpuppet account you did? | |
| ▲ | RicDan 19 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Is this a bot account? Why is it green and spouting nonsense? There is nothing quoted in the previous comment | | |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | xandrius a day ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| You call it government intervention, we call it good government. |
|
| ▲ | valesco 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Hopefully this uniquely American push for dysfunctional government stays on their side of the ocean. |
|
| ▲ | stavros a day ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Because a monopoly extracting 30% of every purchase you make is a dream scenario? |
| |
| ▲ | tt24 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | How is Apple a monopoly? | | |
| ▲ | stavros 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | They own the only app store you can use on an iPhone. | | |
| ▲ | tt24 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Okay, using that definition, Walmart, Target, Dollar Tree, my local regional grocery store, Trader Joe's and Ralph's are monopolies as well. They own their shelves and store space, and are the sole arbiters responsible for deciding what is sold within them. | | |
| ▲ | stavros 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | If you have purchased your own Walmart and corporate still decides what you sell within it, then yes, that is exactly the same. | | |
| ▲ | tt24 7 hours ago | parent [-] | | Okay, so it has to be something you purchase - we're slowly getting closer to the true opinion here. Sony is a monopoly as well then? They decide what gets sold in the Playstation store. Same with Nintendo. Ford and Tesla are monopolies, they solely decide what is software is sold or used in their car's infotainment center stores, despite the fact that I have purchased the car! AWS is a monopoly, despite the fact that I purchase an EC2 instance from them for one year they will not let me run certain kinds of software on it (Parler, some crypto, etc.) | | |
| ▲ | stavros 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | If you purchase a physical device, yes. You don't buy devices from AWS, you rent. I'm not sure what's hard about this. | | |
| ▲ | tt24 2 hours ago | parent [-] | | I notice how you intentionally didn't respond to the other two points, interesting. | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|