> In their determination, national security agencies referenced, among other things, concerns that that foreign-made UAS could be used for attacks and disruptions, unauthorized surveillance, sensitive data exfiltration, and other UAS threats to the homeland.

So people planning attacks and disruptions and unauthorized surveillance will have to buy drones made in the USA?

▲

altairprime 11 hours ago | parent | next [-]

No: the threat model as stated is referring to, in restated terms, “China could silently occupy DJI headquarters and control US-deployed DJI drones into quasi-military strikes using firmware updates, remote controls, or other such mechanisms.” Same theory as Huawei 5G routers could be remotely wiretapped in various ways, etc.

(It’s important to distinguish it from the “buy drone-as-weapon at US retail, use drone inside US” threat model, but beyond telling them apart, I have no position prepared on the relevance of either model.)

▲

05 10 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Because drones without explosives strapped to them are so effective.. not to mention they spend 99.9% of the time in storage with battery disconnected, so easy to make a bunch of them attack at the same time (because once people know the drones are malicious it’s game over for the attackers).

pure idiocy.

▲

lazide 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

With the way DJI drone updates are deployed, that isn’t actually that far fetched, technically. Assuming the targeted event was known in advance in time/space.

It would likely be an obvious act of war, but technically it wouldn’t be that hard to pull off.

	▲	testing22321 an hour ago \| parent [-]
		As another commenter pointed out, the vast majority of drones are in storage, indoors, with no battery connected.

▲

bambax 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

No, they can buy previously authorized DJI drones, or used ones on eBay, no problem.