| ▲ | pheggs 2 days ago |
| there are at least two reasons trump is pushing for oil: 1) the US has lots of oil reserves, which would lose lots of value if everybody was using renewables
2) oil is the main driver for dollar demand, as oil is paid in dollar, allowing the US to have lots of debt relatively cheaply That's also the reason why he wants to tell Europe to stop using renewables, and that's the reason why he is threatening Venezuela - because they have the biggest oil reserve and started selling it in different currencies. Now whether that whole genius strategy to gain wealth through geopolitics is worth an extinction event is a different story. |
|
| ▲ | Jtsummers 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| > That's also the reason why he wants to tell Europe to stop using renewables, and that's the reason why he is threatening Venezuela - because they have the biggest oil reserve and started selling them not in USD. What's interesting is that the strategy you suggest (tell Europe to stop using renewables, attack nations that compete with US oil sales) only motivates other nations to move away from oil. It's a terrible strategy if the intent is to sell more US oil. Renewables are far more sustainable in many regards, and bolster national energy security while remaining on fossil fuels leaves them weak wrt energy security. |
| |
| ▲ | jopsen 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Also the US is increasingly proving itself as an unreliable partner. Do you want that for your energy supply? This is just more of that, contracts in the US are suddenly subject to political winds. In the end, this will probably be unblocked by the legal system, and eventually the US tax payers will pay for damages.
But it'll be a long time. | |
| ▲ | pheggs 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | it could very well be that it backfires. I guess time will tell. A lot of his actions seem to be trimmed into this direction, and it's not a new one. He left the paris climate agreement quite a while back as far as I remember. blocking offshore wind construction just fits this agenda, as supporting companies to manufacture these windmills would just make everything cheaper (more demand, rising production capacity etc.) and demonstrate actual use of it. At least that's how I see this. | | |
| ▲ | Jtsummers 2 days ago | parent [-] | | > it could very well be that it backfires. It's kind of hard to see the strategy you outlined as doing anything other than backfiring. Oil and other fossil fuels are consumables. Once burned, they're gone. For strategic reasons, most nations with any sense and the economic ability to do so are turning away from fossil fuels precisely due to this fact. European nations are not exceptional here, the US is actually the outlier. Your suggested strategy is that the US wants European nations to buy more US oil, and in order to motivate them the US is demonstrating how bad oil dependence is. See Cuba (they depend on Venezuelan oil there). How could a demonstration of the flaws of oil dependency possibly motivate the sale of US oil rather than hasten the move towards solar, wind, and other power sources? This is why I said it's a terrible strategy. Only the non-thinking would go for it. | | |
| ▲ | pheggs 2 days ago | parent [-] | | You could be right. I try to abstain from making any predictions, because I see the world is such a complicated mess where even stupid decisions could get a positive outcome due to unforeseeable events. (a new pandemic? a war breaks out? someone decided to retaliate? the suez canal gets occupied? a volcano erupts?) That being said, he is obviously aware that Europe is planning on greener energy. This administration also tries to break down the EU by pulling out countries like Italy and Poland. They are clearly promoting right wing parties all over Europe which align more with his agenda and are more EU sceptic. They might try to use social media for propaganda. The goal is divide and conquer. Europe has to pay attention to this and be aware of the risk. The strategy may seem stupid, but it would be even more stupid to ignore it and not make sure it fails. That's my personal opinion on this subject. |
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | aqme28 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| There is a third important reason-- For some reason, oil has masculine aesthetics but wind power doesn't. I don't think this is a calculated play |
| |
| ▲ | osn9363739 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | How many people actual think like this or are influenced by it? (I'm going to be disappointed aren't I) | | |
| ▲ | llbbdd 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Nobody at all, but isn't it scary to imagine? In fact we could imagine and invent all kinds of scary things if we think too much. Ahh! | | |
| ▲ | ssl-3 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | | I know plenty of people personally who can rant about energy prices being high while somehow finding room in the same breath to demonize wind and solar energy and even namedrop whichever foul devil bogeyman it is this week that is said to be the cause of this disjointed trauma that they find so overwhelming. In the next breath, they pick something else from the deck to be upset about: These days, that's usually brown people, emails, laptops, the American cities that people in frog costumes burn to the ground every night, brown people, guns, laptops, and Hillary. Sometimes, they then take a break to hear themselves talk about baseball, praise the president for getting so much done that he doesn't even have time to sleep, or to complain about the plot from the episode of The Dukes of Hazard -- from 1983 -- that they watched for the 14th time last night on Pluto. After the break, it's time for them to complain about how they can't afford visit a doctor or buy eyeglasses, but they sure as hell don't want them any of those librawls to take any of their hard-earned money so everyone can go to the doctor. Then things shift back to being weirder again: Schools turning boys into girls, kids using litter boxes in the classroom, men wearing dresses, God's Perfect Plan, guns, brown people, groceries, brown people, and blue hair dye. This tiresome process repeats until I manage to escape, or I tell them very pointedly to shut the fuck up (hints don't work). None of the people I know who act this way seem to be particularly bright, but I know them anyway. And they vote. (Yes, I've checked.) | | |
| ▲ | hunterpayne 2 days ago | parent [-] | | "while somehow finding room in the same breath to demonize wind and solar energy " Did you ever consider that all the money spent on expensive renewables is money not spent on cheaper forms of power? Did you ever consider that they are correct and that spending on renewables drives up power costs? Because that's what the data says is happening. Now, I am aware that the amount of FUD on this topic is very different to get through. But if you learn about the differences between capacity and utilization costs and the other accounting games that are played with energy costs, you will learn how to see through the FUD. But I'm sure it is more psychologically comforting to just look down on them which is what you are actually doing. | | |
| ▲ | ssl-3 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I consider that I'm intertwined in the evolution of a very different friend's very local efforts, with their own hybrid battery-backed grid-tied offline-capable solar power system. That rig is pretty sweet. It pays for itself, and in present form and with their present use (wherein: they're not trying to live particularly-efficiently) it is almost entirely capable of keeping them with power even if the grid goes down for an indefinite period. But, sure: We can talk about games, instead, if what you want to chat about is just games. What games might you have in mind? | | |
| ▲ | hunterpayne 2 days ago | parent [-] | | "entirely capable of keeping them with power even if the grid goes down for an indefinite period." You do know that batteries have a capacity right? And powerplants have something called a capacity factor. That means for a given amount of capacity, you generate on average a certain amount of power. For nuclear that factor is .9. For renewables its .1. So 1 watt of nuclear provides the same power as 9 watts of renewables. That's why when you say that renewables have 1/3 the capacity cost, it really means its 3x more expensive than nuclear. That means higher bills for people, which is what we mean when we say utilization cost. That's the real cost that people pay and actually counts. And all this is before we talk about siting issues with renewables. Fun fact, most PV is sites (located) somewhere with an albino factor of less than .25. But since you connected a battery terminal to a PV panel, you must know what that means. Seriously, you are just spreading misinformation that transfers cost from the rich to the poor, such a hero you are. | | |
| ▲ | ssl-3 a day ago | parent [-] | | I didn't say that renewables have 1/3 of anything. And I'm a big fan of nuclear power. I, for one, am completely in favor of having as many nuclear power plants in my back yard as possible. You seem to be having an argument with someone who is not present -- as if you have some unseen enemy. This delusion has been noted. There is nothing here for us to discuss. Good day. |
|
|
|
| |
| ▲ | array_key_first 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | Most grown men are influenced by this. The patriachy is strongggg. Just like you can manipulate women en-masse by appealing to patriarchal attitudes around femininity and beauty, maybe by talking about weight or hair, you can influence men by appealing to patriachal attitudes around masculinity. I mean, you can convince the average American man to drop an extra 20K on a truck he doesn't need and a multiply his gas cost by 2x just by convincing him it's manly. You can discourage men from drinking cosmopolitans and instead have them drink the equivalent of cat piss by telling him it's unmanly. |
|
| |
| ▲ | senectus1 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | The Aplha Male Energy didnt do so well over the weekend.
One got its jaw broken in two places... the other just got pounded into submission. |
|
|
| ▲ | unmole 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > oil is the main driver for dollar demand, as oil is paid in dollar This stupid meme needs to die. |
|
| ▲ | tagawa 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Maybe a third reason: “Last week, Trump Media, the parent company of Truth Social that is majority-owned by the president, said it was getting into the energy business, announcing a merger with a fusion firm TAE Technologies.” Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd74lyr094vo |
| |
| ▲ | iszomer 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Coincidentally, TAE Technologies had a product placement baked into the 2021 film named Finch with Tom Hanks, distributed by Apple Original Films. |
|