Dumb question, but isn't there a risk of spreading cancer causing proteins throughout the body with this approach?

ramraj07 8 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Cancer isn't caused by proteins in the way you might think. Its definitely not infectious at the protein level. You could ask if this disruption spreads out cancer cells themselves and that would be fair to ask. But then the cancer cells were already in your body and were likely trying to migrate to other sites anyway.

▲

amelius 7 hours ago | parent [-]

Ok, but this might stimulate migration further.

	▲	sowbug 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		The success of surgery to remove solid tumors usually hinges on whether there are "clean margins," meaning they were able to remove all the bad tissue and a little good surrounding tissue just to be sure. It's likely that the same principle applies using this new procedure: if you blast the whole thing and trust the body to clean up the mess, hopefully there won't be anything left to worry about.

▲

ramoz 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> Histotripsy generally seems to stimulate an immune response, helping the body attack cancer cells that weren’t targeted directly by ultrasound. The mechanical destruction of tumors likely leaves behind recognizable traces of cancer proteins that help the immune system learn to identify and destroy similar cells elsewhere in the body, explains Wood. Researchers are now exploring ways to pair histotripsy with immunotherapy to amplify that effect.

▲

jjtheblunt 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

the article talks about this, the (too vaguely explained) tldr is that pulverization allows neoantigens to be exposed to the immune system rather than hidden within a tumor. i saw elsewhere (weeks ago) an article that this worked excellently, but this article seems to not reference it.

this is one such article:

https://viterbischool.usc.edu/news/2025/11/tricking-tumors-i...