Just an idea - how about not breaking the law?

Oh please. "The law" is a Kafkaesque patchwork that delegates authority to local officials and has enough complexity and wiggle room to make anything possible. We're not talking about a speed limit sign here. Show me the [company], I'll show you the crime.

I've been assured by people in this thread and others that, for example, if you "don't spy on users", you don't need cookie banners, and yet official EU sites have them.

▲

embedding-shape 6 hours ago | parent [-]

> Show me the [company], I'll show you the crime.

Yeah, maybe that floats the people's boat wherever you live, but in other countries where people's health and well-being go above corporate interests, it is not common for companies to break the law.

> for example, if you "don't spy on users", you don't need cookie banners, and yet official EU sites have them.

Which is true, and you can understand that yourself by not relying on others, but reading the regulation yourself. It's actually pretty simple, and I think even someone who don't like regulations would be able to get through it if you apply yourself.

And yeah, even official EU sites could avoid it if they'd chose to not use tracking cookies. Not sure what the gotcha is supposed to be here? There is no inconsistency here.

▲

rpdillon 6 hours ago | parent [-]

> I think even an American would be able to get through it if you apply yourself.

This doesn't belong on HN.

	▲	embedding-shape 6 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		True, and I see now it could be read in a way I didn't intended it to, fixed it by making it clearer what I meant. Thanks :)
	▲	6 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		[deleted]