If we actually (as the title seems to imply) invert the parentheses, then for your example we get 1+2)*(3 .

Now all you need are the opening and closing parentheses at the start and end, and we're back to normal.

▲ sunir 5 hours ago | parent | next [-]

Thank you. I thought I was going crazy reading the article which doesn’t connect open and close parenthesis :: higher and lower precedence :: indent and outdent :: +1 and -1 and just flip it around to get the opposing polarity.

A real Wesley Crusher moment.

▲ swiftcoder 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

Yeah, that seems a much more robust formulation of the whole thing. Flip all parens and enclose the whole string in more parens.

	▲	chrisweekly 7 hours ago \| parent [-]
		that results in `(1+2)(3)` which is (as GP notes), equivalent to "normal", ie what we do today: `(1+2)3` Right?