| ▲ | venturecruelty 11 hours ago | |||||||
I don't know why people can't take 0.3 seconds to type "what does CTA stand for?" into their favorite search engine/LLM/text-message-to-a-friend. This is "Hacker" News, yes? What do hackers know how to do? Learn things, yes? Oh, and I also don't know why this needs to come up on approximately every single post that has an abbreviation that someone doesn't know. | ||||||||
| ▲ | nmz 6 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||
It stands for "Chicago transit authority". I don't know about you, but search engines have become useless since last year, I'm talking downright unusable. | ||||||||
| ||||||||
| ▲ | ryanjshaw 10 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
I googled it and it was defined as a marketing term, so I figured that can’t be the right one in a comment about freedom of speech. | ||||||||
| ▲ | kunley 11 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
To be exact, it takes more time than 0.3s to type it, even for a fast typer. I don't know why people can't not exaggerate things? Doing it is certainly making their message less reliable, not more | ||||||||
| ▲ | sowbug 4 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |||||||
It's nice for writing to be sufficiently self-contained for the reader to get the basic meaning without research. How does it affect your sense of perspicacity when a sentence forces you to consult a dictionary just to keep up? | ||||||||
| ▲ | MarkusQ 5 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||
A search engine can tell you what some people mean by the acronym. It can't tell you what this particular author meant. It's like asking an LLM where you left your car keys, or asking Google what your spouse wants for dinner. | ||||||||