| |
| ▲ | eru 2 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Well, if you want to be pedantic, it's litres-of-fuel per km-driven. That doesn't cancel as nicely, if you don't drop the annotations. Arguably, we should probably use kg-of-fuel (or mol) instead of litres-of-fuel anyway. | | |
| ▲ | catlikesshrimp an hour ago | parent [-] | | "litres-of-fuel per km-driven" (Volume/Distance) is still fully reductible to an area: litres is still a volume (1 cubic decimeter) and km is still a distance (1x10⁴ dm) Maybe you meant that the other way around? Distance/Volume (as in Miles/gallon) is an Area⁻¹ (Distance⁻²), which is more difficult to imagine in space. Now, Kg is a measure of mass (or weight, depending on who you are asking), which throws density into the equation, which is proportional to the temperature, which will vary according to where and when the driving takes place. But since the time and place, and hence the temperature is (allegedly) defined when the fuel consumption was tested, the density is a constant, and as such you can leave it out from the relation. Mass = V*ρ (I know, I am being pedantic² :) |
| |
| ▲ | lostlogin 4 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | > miles-per-gallon (or litres-per-km) [1]. The UK is metric except for distance and beer. So the disgusting ‘miles-per-litre’ is presumably needed too. | | |
| ▲ | skissane 3 hours ago | parent [-] | | Also the UK gallon is different from the US gallon. And the same applies to all the other non-metric fluid measurements such as pints and fluid ounces. Historically the UK gallon was used throughout the former British Empire (Australia, Canada, India, Ireland, Malaysia, New Zealand, South Africa, etc). By contrast, almost nobody ever officially used the US gallon except for the US (and a small handful of highly US-influenced countries such as Liberia). |
|
|