| ▲ | zedascouves 7 hours ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Hum? I just tell claude to review pr #123 and it uses 'gh' to do everything, including responding to human comments! Feedback from coleagues has been awesome. We are sooo gonna get replaced soon... | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | tharkun__ 5 hours ago | parent | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Not my experience. Most Claude reviews are horrible and if I catch you replying with Claude (any AI really) under your own name you are gonna get two earfulls. Don't get me wrong, if you have an AI bot that I can have a convo with on the PR, sure. But you passing their stuff off as you: do that twice and you're dead to me. Now, I use it as well to review, just like you mention it pulls it via gh, has all the source to reference and then tells me what it thinks. But it can't be left alone. Similarly people have been trying to pass root cause analyses off as true and they sound confident but have holes like a good Swiss cheese. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | didibus 5 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
> Feedback from colleagues has been awesome Colleague's feedback: Claude> Address comments on PR #123 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | porise 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Good thing I work on an old C++ code base where it's impossible for AI to go through the millions of lines that all interact horribly in unpredictable ways. | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||