| ▲ | Hnrobert42 7 hours ago | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The last section of TFA is called "What happens if the dome is punctured?". The answer: a release of CO2 equal to about 15 transatlantic flights. People have to stand back 70m until it clears. It would not be good, but it wouldn't be Bhopal. And there are still plenty of factories making pesticides. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | creativeSlumber 7 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comparing it to X flights maybe correct from a greenhouse emissions standpoint, but extremely misleading from a safety perspective. A jet emits that co2 spread over tens of thousands of miles. The problem here is it all pooled in one location. Also that statement of 70 meters seem very off, looking at the size of the building. What leads to suffocation is the inability to remove co2 from your body rather than lack of oxygen, and thus can be life threatening even at 4% concentration. It should impact a much much larger area. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | Animats 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> People have to stand back 70m until it clears. How did they calculate that evacuation distance? CO2 is heavy. That little house about 15m from the bubble needs to be acquired. The topography matters. If the installation is in a valley, a dome rip could make air unbreathable, because the CO2 will settle at the bottom. People have been killed by CO2 fire extinguishing systems. It takes a reasonably high concentration, a few percent, but that can happen. They need alarms and handy oxygen masks. Installations like this probably will be in valleys, because they will be attached to wind farms. The wind turbines go in the high spots and the energy storage goes in the low spots. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||