| ▲ | estearum a day ago | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
> Their argument is that only non citizens who committed some crime get deported This has always been true in the US, and is increasingly not true now. The data is extremely clear on this. > any non citizen can get deported because nothing in constitution prevents it This is only true with an asterisk which makes it not applicable to the current situation. In the US, even non-citizens (even the subset of illegal non-citizens) have due process rights, which the Trump admin is systematically violating. "Whether someone is a citizen or not" is actually completely irrelevant for the question of whether they have due process rights under our Constitution. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ▲ | throwaway290 a day ago | parent [-] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Show the data then. Seriously. I couldn't find examples of deports of US citizens OR non citizens who did not commit crime or administrative wrongdoing. > non-citizens have due process rights Yes, so now you said US should hold itself to higher standard. And I already said I agree with it. > "Whether someone is a citizen or not" is actually completely irrelevant for the question of whether they have due process rights under our Constitution. If true then this looks like another great point that is lost into the abyss because the whole thread was killed. which part of constitution? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||