Remember when your goal posts were Turing test?

The only question remaining is what is the end point of AGI capability.

What’s the final IQ we’ll hit, and more importantly why will it end there?

Power limits? Hardware bandwidth limit? Storage limits? the AI creation math scales to infinity so that’s not an issue.

Source data limits? Most likely. We should have recorded more. We should have recorded more.

> Remember when your goal posts were Turing test?

No. You are misrepresenting the test's purpose, the argument made around it and the results people have gotten. Turing was explicit that the question was ill-posed in the first place, and proposed a test of useful capability. But even then, hypothetical imagining of what a "passing" agent's responses might look like, was radically different from what we get today. And the supposed "passes" we've seen recently are highly suspect.

Last I checked the Turing test stands. I've only seen reports of LLMs winning under some weird conditions. Interestingly, these were a year or two ago, and nobody seem to have tried Turing tests lately with newer LLMs.