You need to separate AI usage from automating certain parts of a pipeline from end to end creation.

Taking a scorched earth approach to AI usage is just being a luddite.

AssassinDuck 19 hours ago | parent | next [-]

I don't think this argument is going to be very compelling. The people whom you would be trying to convince here, would just argue that the Luddites were correct in their fight against human labor being displaced. They'll argue that the power artisans had over their work was diminished with the advent of the loom, just like the power artists have over their labor is being diminished right now.

▲

PunchyHamster 18 hours ago | parent | next [-]

That's very easy problem to solve, take the things from them that were created thanks to problems, they will change mind quickly

▲

JKCalhoun 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I don't disagree with your point, but regardless of how you or I feel about it, this flap will likely seem quaint a decade from now. It's the unstoppable way the world is moving.

I'd love for them to create a separate category for "Best non-AI game". They can fight it out over that award. Perhaps then in a decade or so they will quietly let the award category fade away.

▲

10xDev 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-]

No you are just not understanding the difference between changing and optimising workflow from displacing creativity and artists.

▲

soerxpso 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

You don't really need to win an argument with luddites. Completely rejecting extremely useful technology and then picking a fight with people who don't is a way to speedrun losing, whether you have "compelling arguments" or not. If the Luddites were correct, they wouldn't be dead.

	▲	asadotzler 18 hours ago \| parent [-]
		So living or dying proves right and wrong? So, if the Polish were right the Germans wouldn't have massacred millions of them? What a garbage position.

▲

113 18 hours ago | parent | prev [-]

What's wrong with being a Luddite?