They are also against it because they believe it will compete with them and they will get paid less.

That’s also a valid reason to be against it!

I disagree, this is the worst reason to be against it. It's choosing horses over trains. Manual labor over engines, mail over e-mail. It's basically purely egotistical, placing something as fleeting as your current job over the progress of humanity.

	▲	MattRix 7 minutes ago \| parent \| next [-]
		It’s incredibly naive to believe that all technological advancement contributes to the progress of humanity.
	▲	JohnnyMarcone 7 hours ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		That's a much easier stance to take for people who are not facing loss of income. If we had wealth redistribution mechanisms in place, I think more people would be pro ai.