| ▲ | Nevermark 19 hours ago |
| I think people way over cook themselves. The economics and amplified power of tanning beds at salons push people to highly overdose. I estimated that 1 minute of artificial tanning is comparable to the 10-15 minutes of sun a day that is recommended. But has the benefit of the whole body's largest organ kicking in for the health benefits. So I tan at home for 1 minute a couple times a week. You can't do this economically with a salon. I don't really get tan, just a little more color. But when I do get any lengthy sun time due to outdoor activities, I tan quickly instead of burn. |
|
| ▲ | willguest 17 hours ago | parent | next [-] |
| I love the idea that we believe that we can replicate all of the natural processes involved in getting a tan, and to such a precision that we can then speed up the process 10 fold, and that we can fit it all into a single unit that can be wheeled in and out of the room. Unless of course our calculations are a bit off, then we accidentally created a bed version of the wrong chalice from raiders of the lost ark, but I think it's fine. |
| |
| ▲ | crazygringo 12 hours ago | parent [-] | | Replicate the natural processes? It's literally just UV light. UV comes in an huge variety of strengths outdoors. There are no calculations to be a "bit off". It's just strong UV. You're making it sound a lot more complicated than it is. | | |
| ▲ | CAP_NET_ADMIN 9 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Sun also emits infrared which seems to cause positive effects counteracting some of the UV related problems. | | |
| ▲ | crazygringo 8 hours ago | parent [-] | | Some cell and animal studies show that there is a slight possible effect. It hasn't been shown in humans, and even in extrapolation from animals, the protective benefit does not seem particularly significant. |
| |
| ▲ | whycome 11 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | Yeah. There are so many variables already. From angle to time of year to skin pigment to duration |
|
|
|
| ▲ | Sparkyte 19 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| I just walk outdoors. |
| |
| ▲ | Nevermark 19 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Nude? :) I do think getting a bit of sun everywhere has to enhance the benefits. Thus my solution. I also walk a lot when I can and weather allows. I started walking with a weighted vest occasionally and it was like my body went into some kind of good shock. I was surprised how little soreness or fatigue I felt even the first time, after a two hour walk wearing 20 lbs. And the physical energy boost was dramatic. I switched to 40 lbs the second time and since. | | |
| ▲ | stevekemp 16 hours ago | parent | next [-] | | Sure! Walk out of the sauna, over the garden, down the dock, then jump into the lake for a naked swim. Do that daily for about four weeks, come rain or shine, whilst enjoying your summer vacation. Of course that probably doesn't work for every country, but here in Finland it's normal enough. Too bad I'm a pale-skinned redhead, covered in freckles, and I get burned if I'm not too careful. | | | |
| ▲ | JumpCrisscross 18 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | > I do think getting a bit of sun everywhere has to enhance the benefit Why? This is not how we naturally insolate. I’m not saying you’re wrong. Just that the status quo is different parts of your body getting sun each day. You’re not replicating that, which places the burden of evidence on you. | |
| ▲ | djtango 17 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | Depends where you live but where I am it's not unacceptable to go for a run in essentially swim wear so you'd be sunning not much less than what you'd get in a public tanning salon | |
| ▲ | medstrom 17 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | There are tan-thru clothes, if you want to be serious about it. |
| |
| ▲ | loeg 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | This isn't super useful for UV exposure in winter, due to low angle of the sun, clouds, and of course clothing. | |
| ▲ | Krssst 16 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | | I just take vitamins if needed, saves time and no cancer. | | |
|
|
| ▲ | crazygringo 8 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > I estimated that 1 minute of artificial tanning is comparable to the 10-15 minutes of sun a day that is recommended. That doesn't seem right. If you only tan in a strong tanning bed for 10 min (or 15 min in a weaker one), it's equivalent to only about an hour in the real sun around noon. I.e. if you've only been going to a tanning bed, you'll start to burn outdoors shortly after that. (And I'm talking about high-UVB bulbs that develop the long-lasting tan that protects against sunburn, just like the sun itself generates.) So the difference factor is more like 4-6x, not 10-15x. Honestly, 15x would be insane. Tanning beds aren't as strong as some fearmongerers suggest. And that's assuming full-body exposure. When you say you artificially tan at home for 1 minute, how? Did you buy your own entire tanning bed? Because if you use the small portable devices (like a Sperti), they're providing only a tiny fraction of what a tanning bed provides, since they're so small. |
|
| ▲ | pazimzadeh 10 hours ago | parent | prev [-] |
| how do you tan at home? you bought some UVB bulbs? |
