| ▲ | alfiedotwtf a day ago | |
Upvoted! I’ve applied this same rule when reading news or watching tv - if your immediate reaction is shock, surprise, or anger, think of a list of organisations who would monetarily benefit [1] from that article or show etc. Nobody does a news story for the fun of it unless it genuinely IS news, but it’s been shown [2] that over 70% is PR pieces trying to make you think one way or another. [1] money talks, and bullshit walks [2] Australia’s Media Watch ran a piece about this a few years ago | ||
| ▲ | illiac786 a day ago | parent [-] | |
The news outlet makes money if it’s shocking or surprising, you don’t have to search any further. Your logic is flawed here I believe. | ||