| ▲ | haberman a day ago | |
A long time ago I read that CadQuery has a fundamentally more powerful geometry kernel than OpenSCAD, so I dropped any attempt to try OpenSCAD. Years later, I never actually got the hang of CadQuery, and I'm wondering if it was a mistake to write off OpenSCAD. I am pretty new to CAD, so I don't actually know when I would run into OpenSCAD's limitations. | ||
| ▲ | WillAdams a day ago | parent [-] | |
The notable limitations for OpenSCAD are: - functional programming model --- some folks find not having traditionally mutable variables limiting - output is as an STL, or DXF using polylines - native objects are spheres, cylinders, cubes, with functions for hull and Minkowski, so filleting and other traditional CAD operations can be difficult | ||