| ▲ | pupdogg 2 days ago | |
Totally agree, a patent by itself doesn't prove something was built or used, just that the idea could be described and cleared prior art. But are you saying none of those patents are even indirectly related to publicly documented programs like:
We know these tests only became public decades later through hearings and declassification. Given that history, it seems fair to ask how much related research or enabling tech might still be classified. Lack of a clear public link doesn't really prove there wasn't one - it may just mean it hasn't been disclosed yet. | ||