|
| ▲ | bambax 2 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Your comment may be sarcastic, IDK; but if it is I concur. Fighting "CSAM" is absurd and ridiculous, and used as a justification for eroding public liberties. So is the fight against "terrorism". The US government has decided to kill innocent fishermen en masse and labelled its victims "narco-terrorists" as a justification for these crimes. We absolutely do not need Palantir. |
| |
| ▲ | dzhiurgis 2 days ago | parent [-] | | > Fighting "CSAM" is absurd and ridiculous, and used as a justification for eroding public liberties. So is the fight against "terrorism". Labelling like this works both ways you know. |
|
|
| ▲ | t43562 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Seems extremely dangerous to be doing those kinds of things with software from someone politically hostile. Perhaps the EU should be weaning itself off that too? |
|
| ▲ | general1465 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > And how do we fight terrorists, CSAM and political opponents without Palantir ? You can make exactly same argument for client (phone) scanning and depreciation of encryption. |
|
| ▲ | j_maffe 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| Please add a /s we can't afford sarcasm in this climate anymore |
| |
|
| ▲ | mschuster91 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] |
| > And how do we fight terrorists, CSAM and political opponents without Palantir ? By doing police legwork and by prevention work (i.e. offer help to pedophiles, don't go and wreck MENA countries for funsies, but invest in helping the civilian populations). |
|
| ▲ | _ache_ 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| I don't think Airbus is fighting terrorists, child abuse or political opponents.
So what is your point ?
Airbus is fighting industrial espionage. |
| |
| ▲ | TeMPOraL 2 days ago | parent [-] | | Missed the sarcasm. But FWIW, all three are legitimate threat actors for a strategic airplane manufacturer. | | |
|
