He wasn't interfering with the building owners. You're making up a justification to screw this guy over. That's really sad.

▲

bofadeez 2 days ago | parent [-]

Oh if he wasn't interferring, then they must have allowed him to keep living there? Why is that sad, you want him to be kicked out?

(You forgot to use logic or explain a point of view and instead just made a random moral judgement and expressed the emotion it made you feel, so I had to make some assumptions about your intentions and depth of thought)

▲

Dylan16807 2 days ago | parent [-]

I think my logic is fine. You pulled reasons to get rid of him out of nowhere, not based on the facts of the case. Not just supporting a possible eviction but preemptively deciding it's the only way to get peaceful use of their building even though they were already getting peaceful use of their building. That's sad, because you're justifying a big punishment as consequence of doing a big good deed, with nobody benefitting.

And your first sentence makes no sense. That's not how people usually work. They get possessive and risk-averse and ban things that are unusual. That "if-then" is a total joke, and without it your criticism of my argument falls apart.

	▲	bofadeez a day ago \| parent [-]
		Just try to calm down and make a logical point. I promise I'll reply if you can think of anything.