I don't necessarily agree with you completely, but I think that's a really great analogy. At the very least full of optimism.

▲

zdragnar 2 days ago | parent [-]

It's a fundamentally flawed analogy. Leo's apprentices learned and improved. They studied under a master and faced serious repercussions if they bullshitted about their ability or what they had accompolished.

LLM capabilities are tied to their model, and won't improve on their own. You learn the quirks of prompting them, but they have fixed levels of skill. They don't lie, because they don't understand concepts such as truth or deception, but that means they'll spout bullshit and it's up to you to review everything with a skeptical eye.

In this analogy, you aren't the master, you're one part client demanding work, one part the janitor cleaning up after their mistakes.

	▲	Terretta 21 hours ago \| parent \| next [-]
		All my LLM assistants are in night school learning and improving. At least I assume, since they're on such an astonishing pace of improvement.
	▲	solumunus 2 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		> one part the janitor cleaning up after their mistakes. More often their master simply pointing out what they did wrong and instructing them to fix or improve it.