Disclaim: I work on SeaweedFS.

Why skipping SeaweedFS? It rank #1 on all benchmarks, and has a lot of features.

meotimdihia 2 days ago | parent | next [-]

I confirm this, I used SeaweedFS to serve 1M users daily with 56 million images / ~100TB with 2 servers + HDD only, while Minio can't do this. Seaweedfs performance is much better than Minio's. The only problem is that SeaweedFS documentation is hard to understand.

▲

magicalhippo 2 days ago | parent [-]

SeaweedFS is also so optimized for small objects, it can't store larger objects (max 32GiB[1]).

Not a concern for many use-cases, just something to be aware of as it's not a universal solution.

[1]: https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs?tab=readme-ov-file#st...

▲

chrislusf a day ago | parent [-]

Not correct. The files are chunked into smaller pieces and spread to all volume servers.

	▲	magicalhippo a day ago \| parent [-]
		Well, then I suggest updating the incorrect readme. It's why I've ignored SeaweedFS.

▲

ted_dunning 2 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

SeaweedFS is very nice and takes quite an effort to lose data.

▲

dionian 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

can you link benchmarks

	▲	chrislusf a day ago \| parent [-]
		It is in the parent comment.