Protip: Any time you read "AI" in a news article, substitute the phrase "faster, more numerous, and confidently incorrect." I don't think we need "confidently incorrect" weather models. Who is asking for this?

These models actually outperform traditional methods on many fronts, including accuracy a lot of the time. They are technically generative AI models, but they're definitely not LLMs.

If it were LLM I’d agree, but that’s not the case here.