| ▲ | jp8585 3 days ago |
| Anthropic released 1,250 interviews about AI at work. Their headline: "predominantly positive sentiments." We ran the same interviews through structured LLM analysis, and the true story is a bit different. Key findings:
• 85.7% have unresolved tensions (efficiency vs quality, convenience vs skill)
• Creatives struggle MOST yet adopt FASTEST
• Scientists have lowest anxiety despite lowest trust (see ai as a tool, plain and simple)
• 52% of creatives frame AI through "authenticity" (using it makes them feel like a fraud)
Same data, different lens. Full methodology at bottom of page.
Analysis: https://www.playbookatlas.com/research/ai-adoption-explorer
Dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/Anthropic/AnthropicInterview... |
|
| ▲ | Terretta 3 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| “Not X. Not Y. Z.” – Are you not willing to edit the tropes out? Or maybe teach your LLM to fix itself. Starting rule set: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Signs_of_AI_writing |
| |
|
| ▲ | furyofantares 3 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| And then you had it write your post even here on HN. C'mon. |
| |
| ▲ | jp8585 2 days ago | parent [-] | | I guess all the interview quotes almost feel like those fake reviews on websites. They are all true excerpts, though. And we had a lot of fun creating all of those interactive bits. I get the sense there's a sort of ai content ptsd here, even some of the replies here are being flagged as ai, lol | | |
| ▲ | furyofantares 2 days ago | parent [-] | | It's not PTSD, it's that I have no clue what you think of the results of your project here when even your comment on HN introducing it is an infodump that came out of an LLM. I can't tell what you think of the results, if you're skeptical of any of it, or if you think it's a smoking gun, or what. I don't know what parts of it you care more about than others. All I know is what the LLM thinks about the project. |
|
|
