| ▲ | jeffbee 2 days ago | |
OCR developers from decades past must be slapping their foreheads now that it seems users will wait a whole minute per page and be happy. | ||
| ▲ | delaminator 2 days ago | parent | next [-] | |
What they are happy about is accurate OCR. Getting the wrong answer really quickly is not the best goal. | ||
| ▲ | culi 2 days ago | parent | prev [-] | |
You can also sort by latency. dots.ocr has the lowest at 3.8s/page. And although it doesn't fare very well against much larger slower models, it's still streets ahead of traditional OCR techniques | ||