| ▲ | another_twist 9 hours ago | |
+1. My favourite bit is when pivots are chosen randomly in quicksort, we get linearithmic expected complexity. The CLRS proof using indicator random vars was a oh-shit moment. | ||
| ▲ | tmoertel 3 minutes ago | parent | next [-] | |
Similarly, quickselect with random pivots runs in expected linear time. For a proof of this, see https://github.com/tmoertel/practice/blob/master/dailycoding... | ||
| ▲ | 11 minutes ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
| [deleted] | ||
| ▲ | gnull 6 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Btw, you can make quicksort deterministically O(n log n) if you pick the pivot point with linear median search algorithm. It's impressive how randomness lets you pick a balanced pivot, but even more impressive that you could do the same without randomness. | ||