| ▲ | RuslanL 10 hours ago | |
How is $1450 justified in modern times? Journals receive papers for free, peer review is free, the only expenses are hosting a .pdf and maintaining an automated peer review system. I would've understood $14.50 but where does the two orders of magnitude higher number come from? | ||
| ▲ | matwood 8 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
You can look at the finances of the ACM here: https://projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/organizations/131... | ||
| ▲ | D-Machine 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
Laundering prestige. Journals do almost nothing, and serious researchers (by which I mean, people who actually care about advancing knowledge, not careerist academics) haven't cared much about journal prestige for over a decade, at least. | ||
| ▲ | slow_typist 9 hours ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
It isn’t, but to get a full professorship, you need to publish in higher ranked journals. APC-Open-Access is just another iteration of the parasitic business model of the few big publishers. In the end, universities pay the same amounts to the publishers as before, or even more. This business model can only be overcome if and when academia changes the rules for assessment of application to higher ranked academic positions. There are journals that are entirely run by scientists and scientific libraries. Only in this model the peer review and publishing platform becomes a commodity. | ||
| ▲ | skirge 9 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
value creation - it's not a hamburger but something serious! | ||