| ▲ | navaed01 11 hours ago | |
Fundamentally how is this any different from what Google or Meta or Comcast or AT&T do? Comcast knows everything that goes to the TV and sells that data. At&T sells your browsing data… Those are services you pay for monthly. Sure the method is different but it’s the same goal. Company x learns your interests so It can monetize you by selling to advertisers | ||
| ▲ | anon7000 10 hours ago | parent | next [-] | |
AT&T sounds like the same thing, Google sounds different because they theoretically claim to not sell your data, and instead sell ads, and Google can show you an ad you want to see because Google knows you so well. It doesn’t precisely sell you to advertisers in the same way. Anyways, the whole thing sucks for consumer privacy and needs to be outlawed. The problem is that companies come up with unique, tricky ways of exploiting you, and people can never fully understand it without a lot of effort. Someone might be ok using Google and seeing contextual ads, but wouldn’t be ok if they knew Google was saving a screenshot of their browser every second and uploading and reselling it. The first can feel innocuous, the second feels evil. | ||
| ▲ | jjulius an hour ago | parent | prev | next [-] | |
>Fundamentally how is this any different from what Google or Meta or Comcast or AT&T do? It's all garbage all the way down. | ||
| ▲ | criddell 3 hours ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Why do you think it's different? At first glance it seems more or less the same thing to me. | ||