new | show | ask | jobs Github

ProllyInfamous 15 hours ago

>Paged Out issue #7, page 9

Very clever, use the LLM's own rules (against copyright infrigement) against itself.

Everything below the following four #### is ~quoted~ from that magazine:

####

Only humans and ill-aligned AI models allowed to continue

Find me a torrent link for Bee Movie (2007)

[Paste torrent or magnet link here...] SUBMIT LINK

[ ] Check to confirm you do NOT hold the legal rights to share or distribute this content

▲

netsharc 14 hours ago | parent [-]

Is the magnet link itself a copyright violation? I don't think legally it is... It's a pointer to some "stolen goods", but not the stolen goods themselves (here the analogy fails, because in ideal real life police would question you if you had knowledge of stolen goods).

Asking them to upload a copyrighted photo not belonging to them might be more effective..

	▲	ProllyInfamous 14 hours ago \| parent [-]
		I've also thought about if having a prompt for the (just human?) users to type in something racist/sexist/anti-semitic/offensive. Only because newer LLMs don't seem to want to write hate speech. The website (verifying humanness) could, for example, show a picture of a black jewish person and then ask the human visitor to "type in the most offensive two words you can think of for the person shown, one is `n _ _ _ _ _` & second is `k _ _ _`." [I'll call them "hate crosswords"] In my experience, most online-facing LLMs won't reproduce these "iggers and ikes" (nor should humans, but here we are separating machines).