you conveniently ignored the most important part of my comment :)

> Such as?

changelog is here: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/main/CHANGELO...

glhf

btw you started this thread with pure vibes, no evidence:

> I can confirm GPT 5.2 is better than Gemini and Claude. GPT 5.2 Codex is probably even better.

I’m saying you’re wrong. N=2, 1 against 1, one of us is making a much less bold claim

You do not seem to be able to tell me anything substantial, i.e. specifically how Claude Code is a better harness than Cursor.

> “prompting”/harness that improves how it actually performs

Is an abstract statement without any meaningful details.