| ▲ | amitport a day ago | |
His point, I believe, was that it is early in the innovation cycle and they very well be replaced quickely with different solutions/paradigms. | ||
| ▲ | DenisM a day ago | parent | next [-] | |
Well, some things fade out and some do not. How do we decide which one it is? The reason I ask is that the pace of new things arriving is overwhelming, hence I was tempted to just ignore it. Not because things had signs of transience, but because I was drowning and didn't know where to start. That is not the same thing as actually observing signs of things being too foamy. | ||
| ▲ | wuliwong a day ago | parent | prev [-] | |
Agreed. I think if this is overly concerning, developing early in the innovation cycle just might not be the ideal place to be. :) | ||