Different scenario but it reminds me of when Missouri prosecuted a reporter who found that teacher's SSN numbers were exposed in the HTML of a webpage

> "Parson described the journalist as a “perpetrator” who “took the records of at least three educators, decoded the HTML source code, and viewed the Social Security number of those specific educators” in an “attempt to steal personal information and harm Missourians.”"

▲

sunaookami 3 days ago | parent | next [-]

Reminds me of a German developer that got prosecuted because he opened an EXE file with notepad and found a hardcoded database password there: https://www.heise.de/en/news/Modern-Solution-Convicted-IT-ex...

>The password to this database was stored unencrypted in an executable file of the middleware product and was the same for all Modern Solution customers

>Modern Solution then reported the security researcher to the police, who searched his home and confiscated his work equipment

>The programmer has thus been sentenced to a fine of 3,000 euros and must bear the costs of the proceedings

▲

gpm 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

That didn't actually happen. The governor threatened to prosecute, and ordered the police to produce a report on their investigation into the matter. The police complied producing a report saying the person the governor wanted to prosecute did nothing wrong.

▲

consp 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Isn't html copyrightable and thus it is a publication? (And thus exposed by the author). Or am I in the wrong ballpark here?

	▲	dhosek 3 days ago \| parent \| next [-]
		What makes something a publication is the act of publishing, not the format that it takes.¹ Copyright is implicitly granted at publication² although registration is required in order to sue for infringement.³ ⸻ 1. Within some limitations: certain types of creative works, most notably typefaces, are excluded from copyright law, although it was determined that digital font files that describe the outlines of the characters are programs and thus eligible for copyright. Bitmap font files on the other hand, as an expression of a typeface design are not eligible for copyright. 2. Although works created by federal employees as part of their job are explicitly excluded from copyright protection. 3. Note though, that the timing of the registration impacts what you can sue for. If registration takes place after the infringement you can only sue for actual damages, but if it takes place before the infringement you can sue for punitive damages.⁴ 4. I should add the obligatory disclaimers that all of the above only describes US copyright law and also I’m not a lawyer (although I did used to watch Law and Order a lot) so everything in this comment could quite likely be completely wrong.
	▲	phyzome 3 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		No. Imagine you wrote a personal diary entry in a text file on your computer, and only afterwards wrapped it in HTML tags. Did you just make it a document intended for broad publication?
	▲	ryanmcbride 4 days ago \| parent \| prev \| next [-]
		It doesn't matter. The judges who pass these sentences don't know enough about the systems to understand whether or not a crime has been committed and they simply don't care.
	▲	wvenable 3 days ago \| parent \| prev [-]
		Raw data isn't copyrightable. You can't copyright the contents of phone book, for example.