Whole article seems very much all llm generated

Edit: I'm an idiot ignore me.

Not a single word of it was. I wrote this one entirely in Apple Notes, so there weren't even any VS Code completed sentences

It has emdashes because my blog turns " - " into an emdash here: https://github.com/simonw/simonwillisonblog/blob/06e931b397f...

▲

webdev1234568 4 days ago | parent [-]

My biggest appologies, a very bad move on my part. I'll pay more attention before any sort of accusation like this

	▲	minimaxir 4 days ago \| parent [-]
		No one should be making any accusations of AI generation without strong evidence other than vibes. That hurts the cause of anti-AI use and punishes people who don't use it.

▲

ramon156 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Do elaborate, I don't see anything standing out

▲

jairuhme 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Did you read the article and come to that conclusion or just blindly count the number of em-dashes and assume that? Because I don't get the impression that it was LLM generated

▲

ai_coder42 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

So what? as long as it conveys the point it was supposed to, should be fine IMO.

If we are accepting LLM generated code, we should accept LLM generated content as long as it is "proof read" :)