Remix.run Logo
N_Lens 4 days ago

I wonder how the public in the UK feels about their country quickly devolving into an oversurveilled state.

drumhead 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

It's always been like this. From the official secrets act where they could jail you just for revealing the date of the office Christmas party to D notices suppressing newspapers from publish stories the government thought were to sensitive. MI5 and MI6 acting totally without accountability, with the government not even acknowledging their existence. If anything, things have started to get more transparent now, with a freedom of information act, actual oversight and accountability for the intelligence services and less government. But the default position of the UK government has always been secrecy and the right to do what they want to protect the country.

hirako2000 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

To protect the country from a government change?

rightbyte 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> But the default position of the UK government has always been secrecy and the right to do what they want to protect the country.

Usually those types are the prime threat to the country.

pjc50 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The public, or at least the section that buys newspapers and gets onto the Question Time audience, seem to be in favor of this. Like a lot of people, they will vote in favor of repression so long as they think it's being done to someone else. Especially immigrants. You can even see it in the comments here.

"Tough on crime" and "tough on terrorism" are magic bullets for winning authoritarian support. That's how people are being persuaded that ECHR is a bad thing.

asdfdfd 4 days ago | parent [-]

[flagged]

blitzar 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

> quickly devolving into an oversurveilled state

The UK has been heavily surveilled for several decades, if anything the pace has slowed especially in comparison to the modern US network of CCTV cameras on every doorstep available to the state and "private" survillence apparatus that has taken over.

rijoja 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Don't ask them on the internet because they'll be put in prison if they complain online!!!

logicchains 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

One of the original motivations for the First Amendment was the UK's surveillance and censorship of American mail; the UK has been a surveillance state for a very long time.

basisword 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Free speech but a president that can deploy the military anywhere in American for no reason. Free speech but an unthinkable number of children murdered in schools on a regular basis for decades. Free speech but bankruptcy if you get cancer. I think I'm alright with the surveillance.

globular-toast 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

I also can't help thinking people living in the UK now are descended from people who didn't leave for the colonies, or were too rich to need to. Far too many of us just can't be bothered.

antonvs 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

I was amused by the UK TV show Spooks (aka MI5), from the early 2000s - it showed an organization with a ridiculous amount of surveillance and other powers, acting in blatantly partisan ways, but it tried very hard to make that all seem like a good thing.

The underlying argument was essentially the same one used in the US: almost anything is justified if it helps prevent anything they subjectively determine as “terrorism”.

globular-toast 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

My impression is if you talk about privacy or rights or anything like that you are immediately labelled a weirdo. Nobody wants to hear about it.

cluckindan 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Remember, remember, the fifth of November…

antonvs 4 days ago | parent [-]

You should mention the year.

That incident was four hundred and twenty years ago. There was no Great Britain, no United Kingdom. Scotland was an independent country.

The UK today is not the same place, not in the slightest.

cluckindan 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

Wdym, the movie came out in 2005

moi2388 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

420? Perhaps it’s time to blaze it..

Silhouette 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If anyone wants an honest answer to that question it is fairly simple. Polling has suggested - very consistently and over a long period of time - that a majority of the British public (though often a fairly slim majority) tend to support authoritarian interventions by our governments in the name of protecting the public. Most of the time our governments and government agencies do appear to use such powers responsibly and so they tend to maintain that public trust. There has always been a significant minority who were more cautious on civil liberties grounds and there has always been an issue that the supportive majority aren't always very well informed about what could happen if the laws were applied more strongly in practice.

As a personal observation - I think this might start to change over the next few years and the current positions of MPs and government might start to look very out of touch. We are seeing the fall of our long-standing "big" political parties and the rise of a very right wing populist party that is increasingly looking like it might actually win significant power at the next general election. I think awareness of the potential for abuse by the next people to run the government and agencies is growing among the general public. Whether it grows enough to stop some of these policies from becoming law in the near future is a different question of course.

amelius 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

There are a bunch of things the public doesn't seem to care about until it is too late.

zimpenfish 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Devolving? Already there. Mostly the public are ok with it because they're ignorant of the facts, believing whatever they read on Facebook, see on GB news[1], etc. and are happy with "if you've done nothing wrong, you've nothing to be afraid of?"[0]

By the time the leopards eat their faces, it's too late.

[0] Much like the people who voted for Trump and are now slated for deportation because 15 years ago they cashed a check that bounced, etc.

[1] Also the BBC has some blame here because if they weren't platforming Farage for years when it was unnecessary, it's conceivable that he wouldn't/couldn't have forced first the Tories and now Labour into their hard-right turns and we'd all be better off.

graemep 4 days ago | parent [-]

> Also the BBC has some blame here because if they weren't platforming Farage for years

Farage is one of the few politicians who has opposed these laws. He wants to repeal the Online Safety Act.

random9749832 4 days ago | parent | next [-]

lol, Farage has already backtracked on tax cuts and his stance on deportations. He is a wet noodle and an opportunist.

zimpenfish 2 days ago | parent | prev [-]

> Farage is one of the few politicians who has opposed these laws.

Farage is in the same position as the Tories currently - he can say whatever he wants because he's not in power and has no responsibility to anyone.

I would be wholly unsurprised that if Reform won a GE and Farage became PM, anything he said before that would be unceremoniously dropped (see: almost every politician who gains power) and, frankly, Farage goes full Trump and, e.g., applies the OSA to censoring everyone he disagrees with.

peterspath 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

1984 is used as a manual

miroljub 4 days ago | parent [-]

I wish they used Machiavelli's Prince as a handbook.

fat-soyboy 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

[dead]

sys_64738 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

The Brits are sheeple and too cowardly to push back. They are the ultimate nanny state.

random9749832 4 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Have you spoke to people in the UK? It is a country of complainers but people who can't really 'be asked' to do anything.

TacticalCoder 4 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Intentions of votes for Labour went from 34% in 2019 to 17% or something now. While Reform UK is gaining voters left and right.

But it seems mostly due to a revolt against the "two tier Kharmer" policy of the current government: where normal people are jailed for online posts while others are free to break a female policer's nose at the airport and then be let to walk free by the judge and while others also get to rape hundreds of girls on an industrial scale and enjoy a nation-wide cover-up attempt (thankfully foiled) by the state...

drumhead 4 days ago | parent [-]

Labour have dropped to 17% because their left wing has moved to the greens, Libdems and nationalists. Reform support has stopped growing at 25% and that's mainly Tories moving across. The only people that harp on about "two tier Keir" are the extreme right wing loonies.

mathw 4 days ago | parent [-]

Absolutely. Labour betrayed their core voters, who are looking for something else, but won't touch Reform UK because they're even more disgusting than the current right-wing Labour-in-name-only government.

46996435797643 4 days ago | parent [-]

No true scotsman