| ▲ | glenstein 5 days ago |
| >If Mozilla killed andblocking extensions Yeah but they haven't and they're not going to, so what's the point of fantasizing about what you would do in that situation? It's like tough guy syndrome, where a person constantly fantasizes about what they would do in the imaginary situation where one of their friends or family is disrespected, or doomsday preppers who spend their life imagining what they would do in an apocalypse that never comes. That stuff belongs on archiveofourown.com, not news.ycombinator.com. |
|
| ▲ | matthewkayin 5 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| Relax, man. It's perfectly reasonable to say that you would stop using a browser if they killed adblock support. Saying so is not "tough guy" syndrome because switching which browser you use is not a tough thing to do. |
| |
| ▲ | glenstein 5 days ago | parent [-] | | It is tough guy syndrome, because it's projecting a hypothetical scenario to performatively declare what you would do in that hypothetical, attempting to hold a third party accountable for something they're not actually doing. Try to follow the ball instead of lecturing me to relax ;) | | |
| ▲ | LtWorf 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Did you read the post? They are clearly considering doing it. | | |
| ▲ | stephen_g 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Yeah, otherwise it’d weird the new CEO had such a precise idea of the amount of money it could bring in. It makes it sound like Mozilla definitely had either considered offers from advertisers or done the maths themselves to work out potential revenue. And for the record, as a Firefox user, count me in with the others who would switch and just use Safari on my Mac if they went through with it! | | |
| ▲ | kelipso 5 days ago | parent [-] | | Same. I use Safari even with the ads because it has the profiles thing. Only reason I use Firefox is the ad blocker. |
|
|
|
|
|
| ▲ | throwaway613745 5 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Constantly Fantasizing? I was responding to a hypothetical based on interpretations of real statements made by the new CEO. It's a public forum for discussion. Firefox is something that is central and essential to my digital life. I think the only person fantasizing here is you, about what random strangers on discussion forums do all day when not responding directly to topics at hand. |
| |
| ▲ | glenstein 5 days ago | parent [-] | | You literally just agreed that you did the thing I'm describing and then insisted I was fantasizing. And you're right, it's a public forum for discussion, hence my criticism of attempting to hold Mozilla accountable for a fictional hypothetical that they explicitly said they're not doing. I'm all for fanfiction, but as I noted before, it seems that these days archiveofourown.com is where people publish that stuff, not Hacker News. It's easy to sign up and if your fiction is creative people will give you positive reviews. But you might need to spice it up by implying a conspiracy to cooperate with Google or something. |
|