| ▲ | ffuxlpff 5 days ago | |
I use both uBO and NoScript and wondered if I really needed uBO if I blocked YouTube as I've planned. However, it leads to Mozilla's earlier weird design choice where you have to install addon if you only want to disable JavaScript on sites - or allow it from only the selected domains. Years later I haven't found a sensible explanation why they ditched that choice. I've understood that you can still do it in Chrom(e/ium) and combined with a good updated blocklist in /etc/hosts or like it would provide most of the functionality of an adblock. | ||
| ▲ | zajio1am 5 days ago | parent [-] | |
On my desktop i use just NoScript and i do not need uBO, as almost no ad is shown without JS. | ||