| ▲ | ukd1 6 days ago |
| Gitea. Gitlab (ish?). |
|
| ▲ | deepsun 6 days ago | parent | next [-] |
| GitLab actually implemented Actions first back in the day (called CI/CD). I remember GitHub was following their lead. |
| |
| ▲ | metaphor 6 days ago | parent [-] | | Which is funny reading how TFA tries to feign ignorance: > When we shipped Actions in 2018, we had no idea how popular it would become. |
|
|
| ▲ | justsid 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] |
| Gitea scales really badly with large repos in my experience. Gitlab works a lot better mostly because you can just throw more hardware at it. This is with a pretty large git repo and a lot of daily commits. |
| |
| ▲ | komali2 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | | On the other hand, gitlab is a memory hog. You need a big vm dedicated to it. We were on codeberg for a couple years and it was fine. | | |
| ▲ | justsid 6 days ago | parent | next [-] | | Yeah Gitlab is a pig, but that’s what I meant with you can throw hardware at the problem. I’ve been meaning to check out Codeberg for personal project hosting since it seems to address the shortcomings of gitea | |
| ▲ | OffBy0x01 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-] | | GitLab scales much better horizontally than it does vertically. 4x 4c/16gb instances will perform much better than one 16 core 64GB instance. | |
| ▲ | brightball 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | You can also just use Gitlab Cloud but setup as many self hosted runners as you like. |
| |
| ▲ | carlmr 6 days ago | parent | prev [-] | | >Gitea scales really badly with large repos in my experience. Isn't it written in this super scaling language that everybody says scales super well? What is the problem with it? |
|
