> I'm not the one dismissing anything.

This statement was false.

> I'm arguing for tolerance, goodwill, and cooperation.

These qualities are not absent because people differentiate source available and open source. And you continued today to argue these qualities should be expressed by changing the meaning of open source.

> A few days ago you said "the impression the different groups have different ideals is correct."

Your point was what? You thought a group had ideals meant a group's only motivation was ideological purity?

> You've spoken mostly in mystical aphorisms so it's been hard to glean much.

No. And several other people communicated similar ideas.