Offtop, but sorry, I can't resist. "Inbetween" is not a word. I started seeing many people having trouble with prepositions lately, for some unknown reason.

> “Inbetween” is never written as one word. If you have seen it written in this way before, it is a simple typo or misspelling. You should not use it in this way because it is not grammatically correct as the noun phrase or the adjective form. https://grammarhow.com/in-between-in-between-or-inbetween/

▲

Antibabelic 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

"Offtop" is not a word. It's not in any English dictionary I could find and doesn't appear in any published literature.

Matthew 7:3 "And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?"

▲

Joker_vD 5 days ago | parent | next [-]

Oh, it's a transliteration of Russian "офтоп", which itself started as a borrowing of "off-topic" from English (but as a noun instead of an adjective/stative) and then went some natural linguistic developments, namely loss of a hyphen and degemination, surface analysis of the trailing "-ic" as Russian suffix "-ик" [0], and its subsequent removal to obtain the supposed "original, non-derived" form.

[0] https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/-%D0%B8%D0%BA#Russian

	▲	fngjdflmdflg 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		>subsequent removal to obtain the supposed "original, non-derived" form Also called a "back-formation". FWIF I don't think the existence of corrupted words automatically justifies more corruptions nor does the fact that it is a corruption automatically invalidate it. When language among a group evolves, everyone speaking that language is affected, which is why written language reads pretty differently looking back every 50 years or so, in both formal and informal writing. Therefore language changes should have buy-in from all users.

▲

speed_spread 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Language evolves in mysterious ways. FWIW I find offtop to have high cromulency.

▲

dist-epoch 6 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

If enough people use it, it will become correct. This is how language evolves. BTW, there is no "official English language specification".

And linguists think it would be a bad idea to have one:

https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/20...

▲

mikestorrent 5 days ago | parent | prev | next [-]

Surely you mean "I've started seeing..." rather than "I started seeing..."?

	▲	dragonwriter 5 days ago \| parent [-]
		Either the present perfect that you suggest or the past perfect originally presented is correct, and the denotation is basically identical. The connotation is slightly different, as the past perfect puts more emphasis on the "started...lately" and the emergent nature of the phenomenon, and the present perfect on the ongoing state of what was started, but there’s no giant difference.

▲

cracki 5 days ago | parent | prev [-]

Your entire post does not once mention the form you call correct.

If you intend for people to click the link, then you might just as well delete all the prose before it.