> Still some scientific inaccuracies, but ~70% correct

That's still dangerously bad for the use-case they're proposing. We don't need better looking but completely wrong infographics.

It's pretty common for infographics to be wrong. The people making them aren't the same people who know the facts.

I'd especially say like 100% of amateur political infographics/memes are wrong. ("climate change is caused by 100 companies" for instance)

We don’t, but most Marketing departments salivate for them.